My lifestyle vs. his life 27 October 2008Posted by MOZAFFAR in Misc.
Unfortunately, it is still a dinnertime pastime to assert that the current War on Iraq is nothing more than a war for oil. It is unfortunate because the point is irrelevant. That it is a war for oil is rather obvious. It is, however, overlooked that the overwhelming majority of finger-pointers did not change any of their oil-consuming habits in protest of this war. Meaning, people did not start abandoning their SUV’s when they determined that the war was for oil (~2003). Rather, they started changing their driving habits when the cost of gas became too high, which was some five years later (~2008). The protest against the war was nothing more than dinnertime lip service. The fact of the matter remains that people do not change unless they are compelled to change.
Thus, can we not argue that a purpose for the war was to sustain our own lifestyles? Countless civilians are getting slaughtered daily and countless more are getting injured daily for that simple purpose: we are, as a national body, seeking to continue our lifestyle, regardless of what the cost may be to others. That is exploitation. Most exploitations do not seek to destroy another people. Rather, most exploitations result when the exploiter wants something for him/herself.
Consider it further, that the national protests regarding the war did not gain mainstream stream except in response to (a) the increasing number of dead US soldiers, and (b) gas prices. Had gas prices remained stable, and had the number of US soldiers remained “low” the outcry against the war would be so much lower. Meaning, had our comfort zone not been threatened, half this nation would still be praising the president. It is our comfort zone that will end the war, not our sense of justice.