jump to navigation

Lines in the Sand 1 May 2006

Posted by MOZAFFAR in History, MOZAFFAR, Politics.
trackback

I’ve had trouble understanding the whole “Islam vs. the ‘West” scenario. Where is “Islam” and where is the “West?”

Meaning, where do I fit in? Within the next 5-10 years, the Muslims of the US will be the most influential population of Muslims on the globe. So, how does that affect this scenario? Similarly, I don’t look at Islam as being present in that stretch from African through the Middle East, through Central and South Asia, down through Polynesia. There are Muslims there, but where is the Islam?

But, the fact is that even though there may not have been an “Islam vs. the West” scenario before, now it’s happening. But where did it come from? Two sources that seemed to have fit perfectly.

First, there was Western and Eastern Christianity. Western Christianity begins ideologically (or in terms of authority) with Rome and the Romans. Eastern Christianity begins ideologically (or in terms of authority) with Constantinople and the Byzantines (aka the Eastern Roman Empire).

Second, many Muslim scholars historically chose the Dar al-Islam / Dar al-Harb dichotomy. The argument was that when Islam was defined on the world stage as a political entity, there was the land of Islam and then the rest of the earth. As the lands of Islam spread, it was to spread — in this reasoning — by conquest. That conquest may have been political, missionary, trade, etc.., but it was conquest.

Now, look what happens in the recent few centuries. The lands once inhabited by Eastern Christianity become inhabited by the Ottoman Empire. “West and East” becomes “West and Islam.” “Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb” remains. The fit is perfect.

No it is not. It’s simply a Eurocentric outlook. Nothing else in the world exists in this scenario, save the West, and the West is just the US, Europe, and perhaps Israel. And, the “Islam” of this world is not geographically “East” considering that North Africa is as “West” as is Europe. The “Islam” of this paradigm is the stretch of lands that have large Muslim populations.

A better reading would be the “North” vs. the “South.” Look at the globe. It is literally the “North” and the “South.”

To be continued in the future, God-willing.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. talib - 1 May 2006

>>>Within the next 5-10 years, the Muslims of the US will be the most influential population of Muslims on the globe.

2. Abu Noor al-Irlandee - 16 May 2006

As salaamu ‘alaykum,

>>>Within the next 5-10 years, the Muslims of the US will be the most influential population of Muslims on the globe.

I often see this type of claim made. Sometimes I even believe it.

However, I think the idea of “influence” is much more complicated than many of those who buy into this notion are really considering.

Why will we have so much influence? And over whom or what will we be so influential? Over the direction of money and other resources? Over the use of military power? Over humanity in general? Over Americans? Over other Muslims who we think somehow look up to us simply because we’re Americans?

It seems obvious to me without reflecting on it too deeply that it is easier to become ‘powerful’ or ‘successful’ if you buy into the status quo and don’t try to change things too much but just try to shift a piece of the pie a little bit. Is this influence?

I’ll think further about it, inshAllaah.

Allaah knows best.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: